Over the years, countless different interpretations of the (notoriously unreadable) Voynich Manuscript have been proposed. Here are some websites outlining a few of them.
More information
More information
Related categories 1
Sites 5
Dennis Stallings' summary (and criticism) of Leo Levitov's Cathar/Endura/Isis hypothesis
Museum of Hoaxes article.
Chris Parry's 2003 assertion that the manuscript is a 15th/16th century fake, written in a pretend foreign language
Jim Finn's theory that the Voynich Manuscript is an "end-times" warning written in Hebrew
Richard SantaColoma's hypothesis connecting the Voynich Manuscript to Cornelius Drebbel.
Museum of Hoaxes article.
Chris Parry's 2003 assertion that the manuscript is a 15th/16th century fake, written in a pretend foreign language
Richard SantaColoma's hypothesis connecting the Voynich Manuscript to Cornelius Drebbel.
Dennis Stallings' summary (and criticism) of Leo Levitov's Cathar/Endura/Isis hypothesis
Jim Finn's theory that the Voynich Manuscript is an "end-times" warning written in Hebrew
Last update:
January 1, 2019 at 19:34:00 UTC
Check out
Regional: Europe: United Kingdom: England: Berkshire: Thatcham: Business and Economy
- Recently edited by merlin1
- Recently edited by merlin1